Define detection limits
Agree realistic minimum defect sizes and contrast using controlled trials.
Inspect the defined sealing path for product, moisture, particles and other anomalies that can interrupt a reliable seal.
Contamination can vary in colour, size, position and contrast. We use representative samples to define the detectable defect range and select the camera, illumination and processing method around the real pack—not a generic laboratory image.
Agree realistic minimum defect sizes and contrast using controlled trials.
Teach acceptable film, print and product variation into the inspection.
Reject or stop before more packaging value is added downstream.
Final scope follows trials and a line survey. The table shows the main engineering considerations for this inspection type.
Send us your pack detailsReliable inspection begins with realistic defects and finishes with the line proving that the correct failed pack was removed.
Agree the pack, line speed, critical seal area and pass/fail tolerance.
Trial representative good packs, known failures and normal production variation.
Specify handling, optics, lighting, controls, guarding and reject method.
Install, commission and test the complete inspection and rejection sequence.
Clear answers before you invest in an in-line inspection project.
It depends on camera resolution, field of view, line speed, contrast and presentation. We establish a practical threshold through trials with representative defects.
Sometimes, but print can obscure visible features. Alternative wavelengths, lighting or thermal methods may improve separation; sample testing is essential.
No. Vision confirms defined visible or thermal features; it does not automatically replace leak, burst or seal-strength testing unless a validated correlation has been established.
Contrast, film print, residue type and access to the complete seal path set the realistic detection boundary.
Tell us the pack format, line speed and seal fault you need to detect. We’ll review the application with you.